According to the case, the government had entrusted the management of the temple to Banshidhar in 1955. Following which, Banshidhar claimed temple as his ancestral property in 1961. Legal heirs of Banshidhar organised a press conference after the favourable order from SC. On behalf of the petitioners, Advocate Ramrakh Sharma said SC has dismissed the original claim. In such a situation, if government has to vacate the temple now, then legal process will be implemented for it.”
}

<!– Google Analytics –><!– Lotame(DMP) added on 08Jan2018 –><!– comScore –>

<!– /11440465/DNA_Article_Desktop_970x90_ATF –><!–end of top add–>

<!–end of mega-menu–>

<!–end of nav–><!–end of logo–><!–end of extrnavi–>

<!–end of hdrscl–><!–end of container–><!–end of hdrup –>

Trending#Shujaat BukhariFifa World Cup 2018Eid ul-FitrRace 3IND vs AFG<!–end of container–><!–end of hdrup –>

Home
India
Jaipur
<!– one –><!–<section class=”articlebxup clearfix”>–>
Home
Jaipur
–><!–end of breadcrumbx–>Supreme Court overrules Rajasthan High Court’s order in Jaipur’s Baiji Temple case Supreme Court
<!– /11440465/DNA_Article_Right_300x250_ATF –><!–bnr300–>Share

<!–end of artlbotbor–><!–end of artlsocl–>Written Bydna Correspondent <!–end of artlbotbor–>Updated: Jun 15, 2018, 03:02 AM IST<!–end of articllftpbx–>Supreme Court has waived off the fine of Rs. 1 lakh imposed on Purushottam Bharti and others accused of occupying the Baiji Temple land at Badi Chaupar. The bench headed by Judge Kurian Joseph gave this order while dismissing the SLP filed by the legal heir of Banshidhar Sharma. Previously, the High Court had directed the government to take possession of the temple in two months on April 20. Along with this, the court had also imposed a fine of Rs. 1 lakh on the legal heir Purushottam Bharti and others.According to the case, the government had entrusted the management of the temple to Banshidhar in 1955. Following which, Banshidhar claimed temple as his ancestral property in 1961. Legal heirs of Banshidhar organised a press conference after the favourable order from SC. On behalf of the petitioners, Advocate Ramrakh Sharma said SC has dismissed the original claim. In such a situation, if government has to vacate the temple now, then legal process will be implemented for it.
Supreme Court

Kurian Joseph

possession

Badi Chaupar

Purushottam Bharti

Baiji Temple

Banshidhar Sharma

<!–end of artlbotbor–><!–end of col 9–><!–end of row–>
‘Priyanka Chopra thinks Nick Jonas is really sexy and their chemistry in the bedroom is undeniable’: Insider reveals
Saudi Arabia to screen ‘The Message’ on Eid-ul-Fitr after four decades of ban
Priyanka Chopra’s fee for ‘Bharat’ propels her to highest paid actress club with Deepika Padukone
Sonam Kapoor-Swara Bhasker fight over SRK and Salman Khan!<!–<a href=”/jaipur/report-rajasthan-bjp-wins-13-out-of-27-seats-in-local-body-by-polls-2625582″ title=”Rajasthan: BJP wins 13 out of 27 seats in local body by-polls” rel=”next” class=”nextstorylink” onclick=”window.location.hash=’article-2625582′;” > –>Next story
Rajasthan: BJP wins 13 out of 27 seats in local body by-polls
<!–</a> –><!– <a href=”/jaipur/report-rajasthan-bjp-wins-13-out-of-27-seats-in-local-body-by-polls-2625582″ title=”Rajasthan: BJP wins 13 out of 27 seats in local body by-polls” rel=”next” class=”nextstorylink” > Next storyRajasthan: BJP wins 13 out of 27 seats in local body by-polls –><!–end of container–>
<!–end of 1st article–><!– /11440465/DNA_Article_Desktop_970x90_BTF –>Next Story<!–bnrhorbx–><!– <script src=”http://static.dnaindia.com/sites/all/themes/mobile2017/js/jquery.autopager-1.0.0.min.gz.js?v=4″>–><!– .articleBlock –>

<!– /11440465/DNA_Desktop_Article_Outofpage –>

<!– izooto push notification –>

Originally posted here:

Supreme Court overrules Rajasthan High Court’s order in Jaipur’s Baiji Temple case